Software Alternatives & Reviews

Ninja Build VS Bazel

Compare Ninja Build VS Bazel and see what are their differences

Ninja Build

Ninja is a small build system with a focus on speed.

Bazel

Bazel is a tool that automates software builds and tests.
  • Ninja Build Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-14
  • Bazel Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-25

Ninja Build

Categories
  • Front End Package Manager
  • JavaScript Package Manager
  • JS Build Tools
  • Package Manager
Website ninja-build.org  
Details $

Bazel

Categories
  • Front End Package Manager
  • JavaScript Package Manager
  • DevOps Tools
  • JS Build Tools
Website bazel.build  
Details $

Ninja Build videos

FORTNITE STW: HERE IS THE BEST NINJA BUILD (AFTER MONTHS OF TESTING)

Bazel videos

Kebenaran dari Powerbank Bazel 450 Series

More videos:

  • Review - BazelCon 2019 Day 2: Half-Day Bazel Bootcamp (Part 1)
  • Review - What's new in Bazel build and Gerrit Code Review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Ninja Build and Bazel)
Front End Package Manager
JavaScript Package Manager
JS Build Tools
100 100%
0% 0
DevOps Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Ninja Build and Bazel. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Bazel should be more popular than Ninja Build. It has been mentiond 60 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Ninja Build mentions (22)

  • TypeScript's Successor is Waiting, and You'll Never Want to Turn Back
    Under the hood, Rescript uses a build system called Ninja. Ninja is similar to Make, but cross-platform and more minimal/performant. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • Using Make – writing less Makefile
    Ninja was super easy to pick up even after using make for some time (10+ years). GN is just a ninja generator that is optional. https://gn.googlesource.com/gn/+/main/docs/quick_start.md https://ninja-build.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago
  • Ask HN: What outdated tech are you still using and are perfectly happy with?
    Really? I thought most new projects were switching to ninja[^1] and have never used it. [^1]: https://ninja-build.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • What was used to build C++ programs before Cmake?
    Ninja showed real promise for a while, but then CMake grew up and people stopped seeing a reason to leave it behind. Source: 8 months ago
  • Building and Running Pidgin and Finch 3
    Now that you have your build system all generated you can go ahead and build everything. By default Meson will use Ninja as the build tool. Ninja is similar to Make but much much faster. You can also generate additional build systems but that's outside of the scope of this post. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
View more

Bazel mentions (60)

  • How to write unit tests in C++ relying on non-code files?
    This is a problem that Bazel (https://bazel.build) solves in a very convenient way. You can just keep using the paths relative to the repository root, and as long as you properly declare your test needs that file it will access it without problems. Or you can use the runfile libraries to access them too. - Source: Hacker News / 7 days ago
  • My first Software Release using GitHub Release
    When doing research for this lab exercise I looked at both vcpkg and conan. Both are package managers that would automate the installation and configuration of my program with its dependencies. However, when it came to releasing and sharing my program my options were limited. For example, the central public registry for conan packages is conan-center, but these packages are curated and the process is very... - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Declarative Gradle is a cool thing I am afraid of: Maven strikes back
    NOTE: I won’t mention SBT and Leiningen here because, with all due respect, they are niche build tools. I also won’t discuss Kobalt for the same reason (besides, it’s no longer actively maintained). Additionally, I won’t touch upon Bazel and Buck in this context, mainly because I’m not very familiar with them. If you have insights or comments about these tools, please feel free to share them in the comments 👇. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • A Modern C Development Environment
    > None of this solves C's only REAL problem (in my opinion) which is the lack of dependency management. Bazel solves this really nicely, I know some people have strong opinions on it but I cannot recommend it enough https://bazel.build/. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • Go Dependency management in large company projects - How do you do it?
    I know that some projects like cockroach use custom build tools like bazel. But we actually really like to use to be able to build our projects simply with the great go toolchain and don't really aim to dive deep into custom build solutions. Source: 8 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Ninja Build and Bazel, you can also consider the following products

GNU Make - GNU Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.

Gradle - Accelerate developer productivity. Gradle helps teams build, automate and deliver better software, faster. DocsExplore the documentation of Gradle. Find installation ..

Meson - Meson is an open source build system meant to be both extremely fast, and, even more importantly...

CMake - CMake is an open-source, cross-platform family of tools designed to build, test and package software.

SCons - SCons is an Open Source software construction tool—that is, a next-generation build tool.

npm - npm is a package manager for Node.