Software Alternatives & Reviews

NATS VS MQTT Explorer

Compare NATS VS MQTT Explorer and see what are their differences

NATS

NATS.io is an open source messaging system for cloud native applications, IoT messaging, Edge, and microservices architectures.

MQTT Explorer

An all-round MQTT client that provides a structured topic overview
  • NATS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-05

NATS.io is a connective technology for distributed systems and is a perfect fit to connect devices, edge, cloud or hybrid deployments. True multi-tenancy makes NATS ideal for SaaS and self-healing and scaling technology allows for topology changes anytime with zero downtime.

  • MQTT Explorer Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-02

NATS

Categories
  • Developer Tools
  • Queueing, Messaging And Background Processing
  • App Development
  • Data Integration
  • Message Queue
  • Microservices
Website nats.io  
Details $

MQTT Explorer

Categories
  • IoT Connectivity
  • Data Integration
  • Web Service Automation
  • IoT
Website mqtt-explorer.com  
Details $

NATS videos

The coolest OSS project you've never heard of: NATS Getting started!

MQTT Explorer videos

MQTT Explorer

More videos:

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to NATS and MQTT Explorer)
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
IoT Connectivity
0 0%
100% 100
Data Integration
54 54%
46% 46
App Development
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using NATS and MQTT Explorer. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare NATS and MQTT Explorer

NATS Reviews

Best message queue for cloud-native apps
NATS is designed to be simple and easy to use, with a small footprint and low latency. It is often used in cloud-native environments to connect different components of a distributed system or to enable communication between microservices. NATS also supports message persistence, security, and clustering, making it a robust messaging system for building scalable and resilient...
Source: docs.vanus.ai
Are Free, Open-Source Message Queues Right For You?
One challenge of NATS is that it does not support reliable message queuing out of the box - messages can be lost if a client disconnects before it receives them. This can be mitigated by using NATS Streaming, a data streaming system powered by NATS, but it adds complexity.
Source: blog.iron.io
NATS vs RabbitMQ vs NSQ vs Kafka | Gcore
NATS is known for its high performance, low latency, and emphasis on simplicity after it was rewritten in Go. Its rewrite in Go makes NATS an ideal choice for demanding and real-time applications and has increased its throughput compared to its original Ruby implementation.
Source: gcore.com

MQTT Explorer Reviews

We have no reviews of MQTT Explorer yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, NATS should be more popular than MQTT Explorer. It has been mentiond 59 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

NATS mentions (59)

  • Revolutionizing Real-Time Alerts with AI, NATs and Streamlit
    Imagine you have an AI-powered personal alerting chat assistant that interacts using up-to-date data. Whether it's a big move in the stock market that affects your investments, any significant change on your shared SharePoint documents, or discounts on Amazon you were waiting for, the application is designed to keep you informed and alert you about any significant changes based on the criteria you set in advance... - Source: dev.to / 10 days ago
  • A list of SaaS, PaaS and IaaS offerings that have free tiers of interest to devops and infradev
    Synadia.com — NATS.io as a service. Global, AWS, GCP, and Azure. Free forever with 4k msg size, 50 active connections, and 5GB of data per month. - Source: dev.to / 22 days ago
  • New scalable, fault-tolerant, and efficient open-source MQTT broker
    Why wasn't NATS[1] used ? Written in Go, single-binary deployment... there's a lot to love about NATS ! [1]https://nats.io/. - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago
  • Introducing “Database Performance at Scale”: A Free, Open Source Book
    About cost, see [1]. Also, S3 prices have been increasing and there's been a bunch of alternative offers for object store from other companies. I think people in here (HN) comment often about increasing costs of AWS offerings. Distributed systems and consensus are inherently hard problem, but there are a lot of implementations that you can study (like Etcd that you mention, or NATS [2], which I've been playing... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Is it an antipattern to use the response channel as identifier
    I am in a project were nats.io is used. Someone thought, it would be a great idea to link data in an event with data in a response using the response channel name. Source: 7 months ago
View more

MQTT Explorer mentions (14)

  • ESP8266 Connection Error -4 with AWS IoT using PubSubClient Library
    Sounds like you're on a good path tracking the problem to aws, not the esp. First of all, I'd try to make it work with a "proven" solution, then move on to your own implementation. I have had good success using http://mqtt-explorer.com/ on windows to diagnose a similar situation. Mqtt explorer gives you very granular control over endpoints and topics, so might be helpful to you too. Source: 10 months ago
  • Duplicated readings?
    I would suggest using Mqtt explorer (http://mqtt-explorer.com/) to see how often the sensor updates its values. This as a first step to narrow down the problem. Source: 10 months ago
  • Can't establish a MQTT connection between an ESP32 SoC and MQTT Broker Mosquitto running on my Macbook
    Use MQTT Explorer to view and generate messages: http://mqtt-explorer.com/. Source: 12 months ago
  • What is the best packet formatting for in-chip communication?
    You can write test programs to send very specific messages to simulate errors, or simulate entire components that aren't written yet. There are also free programs like MQTT Explorer that will let you browse the message traffic, generate messages manually, log whatever you cant, and even graph your values if you happen to send numerical values (that is really cool when you do some long-term testing). Source: about 1 year ago
  • Problem with mqttx
    To use a local server can let you control all details of your full messaging chain. Try other clients can make you away from the ill behaviors or bugs of specific client. I recently demonstrate how easy a free MQTT client (MQTT explorer) send to a free MQTT database on Windows 10 in my video. Source: over 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing NATS and MQTT Explorer, you can also consider the following products

Socket.io - Realtime application framework (Node.JS server)

mosquitto - Eclipse Mosquitto is an open source (EPL/EDL licensed) message broker that implements the MQTT protocol versions 5.0, 3.1.1 and 3.1. Mosquitto is lightweight and is suitable for use on all devices

Firebase - Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications for mobile and web.

MQTTBox - MQTTBox enables to create MQTT clients to publish or subscript topics, create MQTT virtual device...

Pusher - Pusher is a hosted API for quickly, easily and securely adding scalable realtime functionality via WebSockets to web and mobile apps.

HiveMQ - HiveMQ is the MQTT based messaging platform for fast, efficient and reliable data movement to and from connected IoT devices and enterprise systems