Software Alternatives & Reviews

NATS VS Apache ActiveMQ

Compare NATS VS Apache ActiveMQ and see what are their differences

NATS

NATS.io is an open source messaging system for cloud native applications, IoT messaging, Edge, and microservices architectures.

Apache ActiveMQ

Apache ActiveMQ is an open source messaging and integration patterns server.
  • NATS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-05

NATS.io is a connective technology for distributed systems and is a perfect fit to connect devices, edge, cloud or hybrid deployments. True multi-tenancy makes NATS ideal for SaaS and self-healing and scaling technology allows for topology changes anytime with zero downtime.

  • Apache ActiveMQ Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-01

NATS

Categories
  • Developer Tools
  • Queueing, Messaging And Background Processing
  • App Development
  • Data Integration
  • Message Queue
  • Microservices
Website nats.io  
Details $

Apache ActiveMQ

Categories
  • Data Integration
  • Stream Processing
  • Inventory Management
  • Web Service Automation
Website activemq.apache.org  
Details $

NATS videos

The coolest OSS project you've never heard of: NATS Getting started!

Apache ActiveMQ videos

No Apache ActiveMQ videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to NATS and Apache ActiveMQ)
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Data Integration
31 31%
69% 69
Stream Processing
0 0%
100% 100
App Development
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using NATS and Apache ActiveMQ. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare NATS and Apache ActiveMQ

NATS Reviews

Best message queue for cloud-native apps
NATS is designed to be simple and easy to use, with a small footprint and low latency. It is often used in cloud-native environments to connect different components of a distributed system or to enable communication between microservices. NATS also supports message persistence, security, and clustering, making it a robust messaging system for building scalable and resilient...
Source: docs.vanus.ai
Are Free, Open-Source Message Queues Right For You?
One challenge of NATS is that it does not support reliable message queuing out of the box - messages can be lost if a client disconnects before it receives them. This can be mitigated by using NATS Streaming, a data streaming system powered by NATS, but it adds complexity.
Source: blog.iron.io
NATS vs RabbitMQ vs NSQ vs Kafka | Gcore
NATS is known for its high performance, low latency, and emphasis on simplicity after it was rewritten in Go. Its rewrite in Go makes NATS an ideal choice for demanding and real-time applications and has increased its throughput compared to its original Ruby implementation.
Source: gcore.com

Apache ActiveMQ Reviews

6 Best Kafka Alternatives: 2022’s Must-know List
ActiveMQ is a flexible, open-source, multi-protocol messaging broker that supports many protocols. This makes it easy for developers to use a variety of languages and platforms. The AMQP protocol facilitates integration with many applications based on different platforms. However, ActiveMQ’s high-end data accessibility capabilities are complemented by its load balancing,...
Source: hevodata.com
Top 15 Alternatives to RabbitMQ In 2021
It is a managed information broker for Apache ActiveMQ which has simple installation and it runs message broker in cloud. It doesn’t need any special look after regular management and maintenance of the message system. It is utilized to send bulk message services.
Source: gokicker.com
Top 15 Kafka Alternatives Popular In 2021
Apache ActiveMQ is a popular, open-source, flexible multi-protocol messaging broker. Since it has great support for industry-based protocols, developers get access to languages and platforms. It helps in connecting clients written in languages like Python, C, C++, JavaScript, etc. With the help of the AMQP protocol, integration with many applications with different platforms...

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, NATS seems to be a lot more popular than Apache ActiveMQ. While we know about 59 links to NATS, we've tracked only 5 mentions of Apache ActiveMQ. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

NATS mentions (59)

  • Revolutionizing Real-Time Alerts with AI, NATs and Streamlit
    Imagine you have an AI-powered personal alerting chat assistant that interacts using up-to-date data. Whether it's a big move in the stock market that affects your investments, any significant change on your shared SharePoint documents, or discounts on Amazon you were waiting for, the application is designed to keep you informed and alert you about any significant changes based on the criteria you set in advance... - Source: dev.to / 10 days ago
  • A list of SaaS, PaaS and IaaS offerings that have free tiers of interest to devops and infradev
    Synadia.com — NATS.io as a service. Global, AWS, GCP, and Azure. Free forever with 4k msg size, 50 active connections, and 5GB of data per month. - Source: dev.to / 22 days ago
  • New scalable, fault-tolerant, and efficient open-source MQTT broker
    Why wasn't NATS[1] used ? Written in Go, single-binary deployment... there's a lot to love about NATS ! [1]https://nats.io/. - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago
  • Introducing “Database Performance at Scale”: A Free, Open Source Book
    About cost, see [1]. Also, S3 prices have been increasing and there's been a bunch of alternative offers for object store from other companies. I think people in here (HN) comment often about increasing costs of AWS offerings. Distributed systems and consensus are inherently hard problem, but there are a lot of implementations that you can study (like Etcd that you mention, or NATS [2], which I've been playing... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Is it an antipattern to use the response channel as identifier
    I am in a project were nats.io is used. Someone thought, it would be a great idea to link data in an event with data in a response using the response channel name. Source: 7 months ago
View more

Apache ActiveMQ mentions (5)

What are some alternatives?

When comparing NATS and Apache ActiveMQ, you can also consider the following products

Socket.io - Realtime application framework (Node.JS server)

RabbitMQ - RabbitMQ is an open source message broker software.

Firebase - Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications for mobile and web.

Apache Kafka - Apache Kafka is an open-source message broker project developed by the Apache Software Foundation written in Scala.

Pusher - Pusher is a hosted API for quickly, easily and securely adding scalable realtime functionality via WebSockets to web and mobile apps.

IBM MQ - IBM MQ is messaging middleware that simplifies and accelerates the integration of diverse applications and data across multiple platforms.