Software Alternatives & Reviews

Hangfire VS RabbitMQ

Compare Hangfire VS RabbitMQ and see what are their differences

Hangfire

An easy way to perform background processing in .NET and .NET Core applications.

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ is an open source message broker software.
  • Hangfire Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-04
  • RabbitMQ Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-03

Hangfire

Categories
  • Data Integration
  • Stream Processing
  • Web Service Automation
  • Ruby On Rails
Website hangfire.io  
Pricing URL Official Hangfire Pricing  
Details $

RabbitMQ

Categories
  • Data Integration
  • Web Service Automation
  • Stream Processing
  • Message Brokers
Website rabbitmq.com  
Pricing URL-
Details $

Hangfire videos

AK 47 Wasr Hangfire - shooter beware

RabbitMQ videos

數據工程 | 快速review | 如何架設Docker Swarm + RabbitMQ??

More videos:

  • Review - What's New in RabbitMQ—June 2012 Edition
  • Review - Feature complete: Uncovering the true cost different RabbitMQ features and configs - Jack Vanlightly

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Hangfire and RabbitMQ)
Data Integration
13 13%
87% 87
Web Service Automation
16 16%
84% 84
Stream Processing
15 15%
85% 85
Microservices Tools
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Hangfire and RabbitMQ. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Hangfire and RabbitMQ

Hangfire Reviews

We have no reviews of Hangfire yet.
Be the first one to post

RabbitMQ Reviews

Best message queue for cloud-native apps
RabbitMQ is an open-source message broker software that allows applications to communicate with each other using a messaging protocol. It was developed by Rabbit Technologies and first released in 2007, which was later acquired by VMware.RabbitMQ is based on the Advanced Message Queuing Protocol (AMQP) and provides a reliable, scalable, and interoperable messaging system.
Source: docs.vanus.ai
Are Free, Open-Source Message Queues Right For You?
However, it's important to note that every tool has its strengths and use cases. For instance, Kafka's strength lies in real-time data streaming, NATS shines with its simplicity, and RabbitMQ provides support for complex routing. In contrast, IronMQ provides an excellent balance of simplicity, durability, scalability, and ease of management, making it a powerful choice for...
Source: blog.iron.io
NATS vs RabbitMQ vs NSQ vs Kafka | Gcore
RabbitMQ follows a standard store-and-forward pattern, allowing messages to be stored in RAM, on disk, or both. To ensure the persistence of messages, the producer can tag them as persistent, and they will be stored in a separate queue. This helps achieve message retention even after a restart or failure of the RabbitMQ server.
Source: gcore.com
6 Best Kafka Alternatives: 2022’s Must-know List
Due to RabbitMQ’s lightweight design, it can be easily deployed on public and private clouds. RabbitMQ is backed not only by a robust support system but also offers a great developer community. Since it is open-source software it is one of the best Kafka Alternatives and RabbitMQ is free of cost.
Source: hevodata.com
Top 15 Alternatives to RabbitMQ In 2021
In this article, we will discuss an overview on RabbitMQ Alternatives. RabbitMQ has a flexible messaging system and functions as a multipurpose broker. But it often stops working, because of its high latency and very slow while doing so. The deployment & management of RabbitMQ is a too dull procedure. It can not be installed as modules, it can be installed only on machines...
Source: gokicker.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Hangfire should be more popular than RabbitMQ. It has been mentiond 5 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Hangfire mentions (5)

  • Do I need message queues for sending emails/texts via services like SendGrid, AWS SES, Twilio etc.? How do you decide if you need message queues or not? What questions do you ask yourself?
    Hangfire (https://hangfire.io) includes default exception handling and is very extensible, I think it's a good mid-level choice and a good alternative to other queue mechanism, if you can't afford to host a separated queue service or can't manage a separated service; also scales pretty well (you can have multiple servers handling the same background job queue, or different queues). It runs on Sql Server and MySql... Source: over 1 year ago
  • jsonb in postgres and should I use it or not?
    I used to just use hangfire.io in .net and worked wonderfully for any long running tasks or schedules. Had a great queuing system, UI to know if they failed , etc. That's how I'd send emails, pdf's, and other things along that nature. Then if it were more just a db related operation, just setup a schedule in mssql job service. Source: over 1 year ago
  • How can In make a function run at a certain date in the future?
    You can use hangfire for cronjob, to run at a time in future, you can use Hangfire.Schedule(jobid, datetime). Source: almost 2 years ago
  • How to handle processing of an entity through different states?
    So another option is to use something like https://hangfire.io to pull the jobs and process them? Source: almost 2 years ago
  • How to update database in a Parallel.For loop?
    I've got a fairly large process I need to handle in background on my .net core web app so I've exported it to a background task using Hangfire. Source: over 2 years ago

RabbitMQ mentions (1)

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Hangfire and RabbitMQ, you can also consider the following products

Sidekiq - Sidekiq is a simple, efficient framework for background job processing in Ruby

Apache Kafka - Apache Kafka is an open-source message broker project developed by the Apache Software Foundation written in Scala.

Enqueue It - Easy and scalable solution for manage and execute background tasks seamlessly in .NET applications. It allows you to schedule, queue, and process your jobs and microservices efficiently.

Apache ActiveMQ - Apache ActiveMQ is an open source messaging and integration patterns server.

Resque - Resque is a Redis-backed Ruby library for creating background jobs, placing them on multiple queues, and processing them later.

IBM MQ - IBM MQ is messaging middleware that simplifies and accelerates the integration of diverse applications and data across multiple platforms.