Avalonia VS Uno Platform

Yes, but the portable GUI frameworks by Microsoft themselves are generally not very good, and they tend to be abandoned after a couple of years. Avalonia is developed outside of the Microsoft corporate madness and seems to be slowly becoming the defacto cross-platform framework because it is expected to last a bit longer than a manager's attention span: https://avaloniaui.net/. - Source: Hacker News / 25 days ago

You should be able to use Avalonia[1] as an alternative GUI layer on Windows, Linux, macOS, iOS and Android. There is a beautiful Avalonia.FuncUI[2] and Avalonia.FuncUI.Elmish[3] which is an implementation of Elmish[4] (based of the Elm language[4]) for F#. [1]: https://avaloniaui.net/. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago

To bad Microsoft refuse to work on proper cross platform WPF support. I've tried Avalonia UI[0], but it's just not the same. For instance the lack of a proper out-of-the-box virtualized list. [0] https://avaloniaui.net/. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago

For desktop, Avalonia, hands down. https://avaloniaui.net/ Open source, powered by Skia, backed by JetBrains, and quite battle-tested at this point for small to medium-sized apps. In theory perfectly capable for enterprise as well, since it's basically a spiritual successor to WPF, which has been an industry standard for about 15 years. They're diving into mobile and WASM well, but that's more of a recent effort... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago

> I don't see any other way to go trully multi platform without making separate UI for Android and iOS. https://avaloniaui.net/. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago

And Uno Platform (https://platform.uno/) is akin to React Native in terms of native controls usage. - Source: Hacker News / 24 days ago

Also UNO Platform (C#) which is suitable for simple or complex cross platform business applications : https://platform.uno/. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago

Why is this a problem? At face value, it isn't a problem. Taking a step back at a more global level, what does "uComponents" mean to the rest of the world? Many of the .NET developers who heavily use NuGet may have not even heard of Umbraco CMS, let alone a 3rd party plugin for it. What if people from the Uno Platform community are browsing NuGet for some kind of components extension library? You can see, this... - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

Not a fan of XAML after trying to get into it, but there is Uno Platform. It wraps native widgets on mobile, just like React Native (which is good for accessibility), and uses C#. https://platform.uno/ My guess is that it's mainly focused on mobile. On Windows, it has no overhead (behaving like a normal WinUI 3 app), on macOS I think it uses Catalyst by default (which was developed by Apple to make more iOS apps... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago

> ...building UIs with the document/element api When the whole premise is flawed, JSX or not, does it really matter if there is a better or worse way of misusing a technology not meant for UIs? Leave HTML and JavaScript to Wikipedia and other hypertext document libraries. Unfortunately, WASM is not there yet, but people are trying: https://platform.uno. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago